10,000 B.C. review
On Saturday, I went to the theater with my girlfriend and we watched 10,000 B.C. With almost $36 million 10,000 B.C. didn’t do too bad at the box office on the opening weekend. Of course, the movie has been hyped since the first trailer came out. I didn’t have any expectations and still I was very disappointed. I promise that this isn’t a small feat – that’s usually not easily achieved. Now, let’s get on with this sorry excuse of a movie. Be warned, there are massive spoilers ahead!
The trailer promised a lot of action and quite a spectacle. Unfortunately, the movie completely failed to deliver. One of the first things I noticed was the unnatural white teeth of the people supposed to live a whopping 10,000 years before Christ. Quite obviously the old mystic did a good job in taking care for her people, including dental service on a highly sophisticated level. Of course, the old woman also happens to have some abilities like precognition, farseeing and stuff like that. That was to be expected.
Let’s get to our hero, D’Leh, who was quite a sucker. When his betrothed Evolet is captured and enslaved by people way more advanced than our pseudo-Neanderthalers, he has to follow the “demons” to get her back. (Did you notice that I wrote “way more advanced”? D’Leh’s people are depicted as hunters living in the Stone Age, hunting mammoths. The slavers look like they came ridden right out of medieval times, having tamed horses and steel(!) weapons.) Our hero and three of his people start out to retrieve Evolet and the other captives. They follow the slavers over the mountains through a short strip of desolate steppes into some kind of tropic jungle, all within a few weeks. OK, time to forget about plausibility here.
